On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200 Urban Hillebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have > reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan - > however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if clamd > is not responding (due to a crash or a misconfiguration). > > With the newly introduced delays during the initialization of clamscan this > would cause us significant problems. So my question is: Will this get > fixed, or is this "working as expected"? We're aware of the problem and it will be fixed in 0.91. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Wed Apr 25 20:40:23 CEST 2007 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
