On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:18:47 -0500 George Kasica <george_kas...@mgic.com> wrote: > On 7/19/2011 4:02 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >> In my opinion, if twitter is a requirement for using ClamAV then >> this project is doomed. I don't see our 'business' endorsing our NOC >> playing with twitter as part of the job. > > There is ZERO chance of that getting allowed here. If this becomes a true > requirement to use clamav then we need to start looking for a replacement > for the 200+ Linux instances that are running. They are less then happy to > see a GPL/Free product out there now, become less happy when it went to > rsync to MANY foreign (Non-US) sites (used in a more or less random style > for the updates), this would just about put the nail in the coffin for it > here. > > Please say that this is NOT happening, I really don't want to re-engineer > a solution because someone decides they like a social media tool for > support. It was hard enough getting the email lists allowed after 3 years > on my internal mail vs. home email.
This is NOT happening. Twitter is just another way to deliver information about the updates to our *users*, not to our software. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <tk...@clamav.net> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Wed Jul 20 15:26:51 CEST 2011 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
