Please find below ClamAV performance statistics In our recent *ClamAV Detection rate test*….
Sanesecurity signatures : *97.11%* SecuriteInfo signatures (free) : 19.03% ClamAV Official only signatures: 13.82% Number of signatures: Sanesecurity signatures : *249,766* SecuriteInfo (free) : 1,110,596 ClamAV Only : 4,137,929 Date of oldest malware Sample in test : 06.01.2015 Date of newest malware Sample in test: 05.12.2015 Optimized Database means the db having leass no of signatures and can able to give more malware detection rate On 4 May 2017 at 17:05, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> wrote: > crazy thinker skrev den 2017-05-04 13:28: > >> Hi ClamAV Developers, Users >> >> To my curiosity, i want to remove ClamAV Official Database and plan to >> integrate unofficial database with clamav engine.. i heard that >> Sanesecurity signatures increases ClamAV performance upto 90%.. >> > > where did you read that ? > > so i am >> thinking that excluding ClamAV Official Database not afffecting ClamAV >> performance in this scenario. because. i guess Sanesecurity unofficial >> database covers signatures which is covered by ClamAV Official Database.. >> > > well if you do this you will shut your self in foots > > Am i right? >> > > nope > > The reason behind to do like this is i want to keep >> optimized database >> i would like to get some suggestions/advices on my experimental thought >> > > define a optimized database first > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
