On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> you post is crap because you don't point to any refereneces (url to said > patch and son on) nor talking what is a "newer GCC" in your point of view > and especially in the context of the problem My apologies. I had been following posts right along on this issue and it didn't occur to me that others were not. My mistake. Here are the URLs for those who may come along later. http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-January/005751.html https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12026 > > why not use distribution packages whci seems to can handel the issues > properly: Again my apologies. I was not aware there were revised -4 flavors available. When ever I went to https://www.clamav.net/downloads it only showed 0.99.3. I thought the latest version with any known problems resolved would be shown on that page. I will look for a -4 version. Thanks. > > clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64 > clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch > clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch > clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64 > clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64 > clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch > clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch > clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch > clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64 > clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
