On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0200 Gianluigi Tiesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | So, to reiterate my question: Must "foo" be GPL-licensed as well? > > it must be gpl-compatible, you could make this kind of use with a non gpl > compatible license > if libclamav was lgpl I would think that this would apply only if the program 'foo' were to be distributed to the world. However, if it is an application for internal use only, I would think that this does not apply. -- Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The only good thing about Vista is that even the viruses have compatibility issues. " _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
