-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robert Wolfe wrote: | On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0200 | Gianluigi Tiesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |> | So, to reiterate my question: Must "foo" be GPL-licensed as well? |> |> it must be gpl-compatible, you could make this kind of use with a non gpl compatible license |> if libclamav was lgpl | | I would think that this would apply only if the program 'foo' were to be distributed to the world. However, if it is an application for internal use only, I would think that this does not apply. |
gpl implies you need to give sources of what distribute in binary form together with the binary if the binary is not public you don't need to distribute to public Regards - -- Gianluigi Tiesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EDP Project Leader Netfarm S.r.l. - http://www.netfarm.it/ Free Software: http://oss.netfarm.it/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiAoDMACgkQ3UE5cRfnO06wgwCfWuBubwMNxG0M4onARkaLfwEP bJQAnRa95BHezUMPiEcJ8Tah7jAIiC7N =08R/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
