On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 12:49 -0700, David Daney wrote: > You also might want to look at comment #1 of: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869
Thanks for the pointer. I think a non-copying unsynchronized StringBuffer clearly makes the most sense. I'll demonstrate the improvement with gcj before my next patch. AG _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
