On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 18:12 -0700, Casey Marshall wrote: > > Since this finally cleans up the target layer stuff I would like this to > > go in now and then we build on this for your further improvements to NIO > > and the socket timeouts. OK? > > OK. Since I'm working off of cvs head I'm probably queering up the diffs > and history; is there any issue with me overwiting some of these > changes, not necessarily building off of them?
No, certainly not. Just do make sure to test early and often :) For timeouts you might want to look at the new failing omg/corba tests that seem to happen with guilhem's rewrite. Those are regressions, so we should fix them. > Since this cleans up stuff beyond javanet, I'd like to see it committed. OK, committed. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
