Hi Roman,
Thanks for checking the file in! The IMPLIED tag in the RI is implemented
as a <p-implied> Tag with a NameAttribute of HTML.Tag.IMPLIED. GNU CP
implements it as a <p> Tag with a NameAttribute of HTML.Tag.P, with a tag
attribute of _implied_="true". The other difference is that since the RI
is using HTML.Tag.IMPLIED, it is recognized as a Synthetic Tag. Whereas
the implementation of CP using HTML.Tag.P is not recognized as a Synthetic
Tag.
Yeah, it would be great if GNU CP can finally claim to be Mauve 1.4 "Wink
Wink" compatitble(MDK 1.4 perhaps?)! It will be able to statisfy many
application developers(me included) enough to give CP a try. I will
probably to hop over to the IRC this weekend ;)
David Fu.
> Hi David,
>
>> I have fixed the formatting, added comments and also finished up the
>> incomplete parts. Hope this passes the muster :)
>
> Looks good to me. I have included it in my local tree and finished it up
> for committing (Some more formatting etc). I'd like to talk back to Mark
> before anyhow.
>
> You added some comments saying that CP's implied tag is different from
> the RI. What exactly is different? Probably we should fix it then.
>
> Thanks for this work. That's the last completely missing class for
> JDK1.4 completeness. :-D
>
> Maybe you want to drop by on #classpath on irc.freenode.net for chatting
> with other classpath hackers.
>
> /Roman
>
>
