Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I still think that a JavaCC based approach instead of
> the doc++ flex-based Java parser is a better approach.
> Then again, JavaCC is not free, and I am not aware of
> a free replacement. 

Look for ANTLR.  This is free software.

> which indicates some confusion about the GPL, either on
> my or on their side.

On their part, unless they changed a clause in the GNU GPL itself.

Brian
-- 
|-------------------------------|Software Engineer
|Brian Jones                    |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]                    |http://www.nortel.net
|http://www.classpath.org/      |------------------------------

Reply via email to