Brian Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If the volume is more than a trickle of messages on compiling java > code with gcc then having a separate list is probably a good thing. > The classpath list is more of a developer list than a user list. > Traffic has not mandated we go to a classpath-devel or similar yet. I would like to see some improvements to our project infrastructure, particularly in the area of bug tracking. Right now bug reports and patches come to the list, and I'm sure many of them just get dropped. Maybe this is something Cygnus can help with. -- Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Artur Biesiadowski
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Brian Jones
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke