"Aaron M. Renn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we do need to develop a policy standard for what packages should > be included under the GNU namespace, and generally how that namespace > should be subdivided. Most of the current packages that are under > the gnu.* namespace could (and probably should) be under the domain > names of their developers. And anything assigned to the FSF could conceivably be renamed to gnu.* ? -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- gnu.* namespace discussion Warren Levy
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Per Bothner
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Brian Jones
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Stuart Ballard
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Per Bothner
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Brian Jones
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Aaron M. Renn
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Brian Jones
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Emil Eifrem
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Emil Eifrem
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Bryce McKinlay
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion David Himelright
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey

