> > > This is not even compiled but It Should Work (TM).
> >
> > I don't mean to criticise, but writing code without compiling it
> > is extremely error prone.
> >
>
> Sure is. That's why I sent it here instead of checking it in :) I didn't
> have a copy of Classpath handy and I don't feel right spending more than a
> few minutes on it at work.
I understand.
> The problem my patch had, though, wouldn't have been caught by the compiler.
> It was a good deal more insidious.
I suppose I mean compiling and running ... but somehow I still think that the notion
of compiling and running the code (in the next few minutes) makes me spend more time
thinking about what I'm writing, maybe subconciously I also know that it will save
time if I fix any problems now and not later.
Hmm, the psychology of programming.
> I believe so.
>
> The patch looks good (much better than my attempt); the only thing I would
> do is put the '[' and 'L' case into the switch ... it's slightly more
> efficient that way, less function calls and such.
Right.
> I'll try and get a cvs tree down tomorrow.
Thanks
John Leuner
--
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
