Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Tromey wrote: > > This is very nice. Thanks! > > It's great fun working on it and making "pretty colored" output :) > > > Yes. It is especially difficult since I think we're targeting 1.4 > > right now. (We certainly have a lot of 1.4 code in the tree.) > > Differences against 1.[123] are therefore less interesting. > > Still, what exists right now is definitely useful. > > I don't think it should take long for someone with the Jode source > code (jode.sourceforge.net) and a computer capable of running it to > diagnose exactly where Jode is failing and why, and fix it. I think > it's just a classfile-version check which needs the "number to compare > against" upped. But since my computer can't even run it, I can't do > that work myself :(
I debugged the 1.4 problem earlier and posted about it I think, ie the line of source and what file throws the exception... but I'm not a class file expert and I don't know what else was added in 1.4 that should result in additions to Jode other than this version check. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.haphazard.org/~cbj/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
