Emile Snyder writes: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 09:25, Andrew Haley wrote: > > Out of interest (and please forgive me if this has already been > > discussed at length) why have dummy methods at all? Wouldn't it be > > better to have a compile time failure for unimplemented methods? > > If you go this route what happens when code which was compiled elsewhere > is run using the classpath libraries?
I guess you'd get a LinkageError? Andrew. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath