Andrew Haley wrote: > Andy Walter writes: > > a surprising lot of emails have been sent about that > matter. It seems that we > > all agree on that throwing *something* would be better > than what we have > > currently. The attached class is a summary of what as far > I understood from > > the emails most people here wanted. > > I'm utterly baffled why you think that the attached class is > appropriate. There was a disagreement as to whether a subclass of > Error or of Exception is required. Last I heard, the promoters of > Error threw in the towel. Howver, your class says Exception in the > comments but Error in the code.
I'm certainly not throwing in the towel ;-) I think it should be an error, but I can live with NYIException being an Exception, what I cannot accept is (ab)using UnsupportedOperationException. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
