On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 05:44, Dr. Torsten Rupp wrote: > Dear Mark, > > > (and I thought > > we agreed to get rid of these kind of macros and would use normal > > functions as much as possible in the future.) > > When I remember right, the agreement was not to remove the macros > completely, but instead make them into "alias"-names for target specific > implementations of some OS-function.
I believe Mark is correct here, we agreed to turn the macros into real functions for debugging purposes. And we'll probably use autoconf feature testing for portability. Getting to the alias-names of some OS-function is a first step and then convert them into real functions. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
