Hi,
You are some character!
Luckily you are not the standard...
These questions must be asked. They are not attacks. That is your own
cultural-specific interpretation...
I am an independent party seeking the best embedded VM, that's it,
that's all.
Regards,
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:49:42PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:28:10PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
- Sable has a large and active community
In the last time the project seems to be very inactive except some mails
on the lists.
Not true. They just like to keep it low volume for some reason (which I
admittedly don't like much). Check again.
Anyways, even a community of 2 is better than the JamVM community...
Please keep your attacks on other communities and projects on the
sablevm lists, where they can be easily ignored.
Thank you.
cheers,
dalibor topic
- Sable is LGPL. GPL does not work for maemo. Read why at
http://sablevm.org/wiki/License_FAQ.
That is only the opinion of the SableVM people. Neither GNU classpath
poeple nor FSF considers this to be correct.
So why do they still think so after such a long time? What would you say?
What's the heuristic then?
If you link native to a GPL VM, then that code must also be GPL, no?
That is an absolute requirement in the embedded world...
Regards,
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
F?rsta L?nggatan 18
41328 G?teborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
