------- Comment #6 from overholt at redhat dot com 2006-09-07 20:17 -------
(In reply to comment #3) > > gjdoc puts a timestamp in the about.html file which causes a problem for > > multilib installs. > > [...] > > (2)add a gjdoc specific flag to remove or include the timestamp > > Personally I think option 2 is nicer. The timestamp is put in so the user > knows > when the documentation was generated. Although I guess it should normally not > matter as long as the correct version is mentioned in the docs. Indeed it should not matter. Also, from my standpoint, I see no reason to make gjdoc incompatible with proprietary javadocs. IMHO we should add a gjdoc-specific option to make it generate the timestamps. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28382 _______________________________________________ Bug-classpath mailing list Bug-classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-classpath
