Andy Tripp wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
(snip)
and anything
non-trivial has to be approved formally, again in public.
Could you provide a link for that? I wasn't aware of that.
OK, last post. A lot of what I said was based on my understanding that
people
can check in non-trivial changes to Classpath without formal approval or
review.
Apparently I was wrong, and if anyone would kindly show me the evidence
of this
formal approval process, I'd appreciate it. I've just reread
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/docs/hacking.html#SEC10 and I didn't
see any mention of it.
Andy
