Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 11:23 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > In any case, even if everyone did have commit access, CVS is still
> > painful for *local* development.
>
> Not for me. I mean, it's not great, but it's hardly a big factor in
> the time it takes to develop code.
I think different people use their VCS different amounts as they work.
I use it *constantly*:
mambo$ awk '{print $1}' ~/.bash_history | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
416 hg
66 bin/thingtest
53 emacs
50 cd
34 chmod
33 cat
28 ls
...etc...
So for me, how the VCS works is paramount to my getting anything done,
and with CVS specifically I almost can't work offline. I'm guessing
you use your VCS a lot less than I do...
Cheers,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
