On 12/08/2010 11:47 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 11:23 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> In any case, even if everyone did have commit access, CVS is still
>>> painful for *local* development.
>>
>> Not for me. I mean, it's not great, but it's hardly a big factor in
>> the time it takes to develop code.
>
> I think different people use their VCS different amounts as they work.
> I use it *constantly*:
>
> mambo$ awk '{print $1}' ~/.bash_history | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
> 416 hg
> 66 bin/thingtest
> 53 emacs
> 50 cd
> 34 chmod
> 33 cat
> 28 ls
> ...etc...
>
> So for me, how the VCS works is paramount to my getting anything done,
> and with CVS specifically I almost can't work offline. I'm guessing
> you use your VCS a lot less than I do...
Possibly, but I don't work offline. Ever.
Andrew.
