I haven't looked at the command line of a CAS in a year or so, but if I remember correctly, on the CAS it was always normal for the kclick to replace the CPU idler.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Kyle Torkelson < [email protected]> wrote: > Mike > We are exact same as you...Virtual Gateway In Band on two 3140's. Whether > I have 0, 50 or 200 users online, kclick is always using 95-99%. TAC told > me it was nothing out of the ordinary... > > I'm still skeptical though... > > Kyle Torkelson > University of Sioux Falls > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: NAC 4.7.1 Upgrade - High CPU on CAS > > Just upgraded my test NAC system (1x3140 CAM, 1x3140 CAS) from 4.6.1 to > 4.7.1. The "kclick" process on the CAS is taking 99% of my CPU, and there > is nobody on the system! I recall someone else posting with this same > issue. I'm in Virtual Gateway Inband mode. Did anyone find a cause? > > > > -Mike > _________________________________________ > > Mike Diggins Voice: 905.525.9140 Ext. 27471 > Network Analyst, Enterprise Networks FAX: 905.522.0511 > University Technology Services E-Mail: [email protected] > McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario >
