So are there any ramifications seen yet with regard to the high CPU utilization with kclick?
Thank you, Josh Heller Sr. Network Analyst Information Technology Kutztown University 610.683.4930 -----Original Message----- From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: NAC 4.7.1 Upgrade - High CPU on CAS This is my production CAS (3140) running 4.1.6 lightly loaded: [r...@cas ~]# top top - 23:12:17 up 464 days, 3:18, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.21, 0.18 Tasks: 63 total, 2 running, 61 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 1.7% us, 6.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 69.7% id, 2.3% wa, 10.0% hi, 9.7% si Mem: 1035588k total, 962836k used, 72752k free, 42060k buffers Swap: 2040244k total, 2876k used, 2037368k free, 588684k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2835 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 8.7 0.0 25757:49 kclick This is my test CAS (3140) running 4.7.1 with NO load: [r...@test-cas ~]# top top - 21:41:25 up 12:02, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 Tasks: 71 total, 3 running, 68 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.3%us, 49.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 50.7%si, 0.0%st Mem: 904184k total, 462560k used, 441624k free, 90544k buffers Swap: 4192956k total, 0k used, 4192956k free, 261208k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2726 root 25 0 0 0 0 R 99.5 0.0 718:37.89 kclick Is anyone running 4.7.1 on one of the newer appliances like the 3310 or 3350? If so, is the same thing happening? -Mike On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Mike King wrote: > I haven't looked at the command line of a CAS in a year or so, but if I > remember correctly, on the CAS it was always normal for the kclick to replace > the CPU idler. > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Kyle Torkelson > <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike > We are exact same as you...Virtual Gateway In Band on two 3140's. > Whether I have 0, 50 or 200 users online, kclick is always using 95-99%. TAC > told me it > was nothing out of the ordinary... > > I'm still skeptical though... > > Kyle Torkelson > University of Sioux Falls > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:02 AM > To: [email protected][root@test-cas1 ~]# top > Subject: NAC 4.7.1 Upgrade - High CPU on CAS > > Just upgraded my test NAC system (1x3140 CAM, 1x3140 CAS) from 4.6.1 to > 4.7.1. The "kclick" process on the CAS is taking 99% of my CPU, and there > is nobody on the system! I recall someone else posting with this same > issue. I'm in Virtual Gateway Inband mode. Did anyone find a cause? > >
