Yes. It looks like the OIDs were changed here: https://github.com/Metaswitch/clearwater-snmp-handlers/pull/168/files
Hope that helps, Mark. From: Clearwater <clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org> On Behalf Of matvey bossis Sent: 19 March 2019 15:04 To: clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti NOTE: Message is from an external sender Thanks, so for example: > snmpwalk -v2c -c clearwater 192.168.37.17:25565<http://192.168.37.17:25565> > 1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3 produces: PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopePrevious5SecondPeriod."node" = Gauge32: 148 PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopeCurrent5MinutePeriod."node" = Gauge32: 161 PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopePrevious5MinutePeriod."node" = Gauge32: 139 Am I right to infer, that the .3 in the end, replaces the deprecated .2 (or .2.1) in the end ? (And that the .2 was a single metric, while the new one comes in 3 aggregations?) The above seems to be translated from: .1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.1.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 148 .1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.2.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 161 .1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.3.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 139 So the logic to change the OIDs of the metrics must have been, that they are not 100% backwards compatible? On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 15:13, Mark Perryman <mark.perry...@metaswitch.com<mailto:mark.perry...@metaswitch.com>> wrote: Thanks, yes it appears the Cacti templates haven’t been kept up to date. Instructions for using the correct MIB is at: https://clearwater.readthedocs.io/en/stable/Clearwater_SNMP_Statistics.html If you do create an up to date cacti template, please submit a Pull Request with it (you would need to sign our contributors agreement). Thanks, Mark Perryman. From: Clearwater <clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org>> On Behalf Of matvey bossis Sent: 18 March 2019 13:00 To: clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org> Subject: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti NOTE: Message is from an external sender My OIDs seem to be different from the ones in the Cacti templates, for Bono, Sprout etc. Am I doing something wrong? Does anyone have the correct templates? Maybe a screenshot of your Cacti graphs, please? Thank you _______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
_______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
