Matvey,
That OID looks to be ending with an IP address.
e.g.
sproutConnectedHomesteadsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SproutConnectedHomesteadsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Statistics for a single connected upstream Homestead"
INDEX { sproutHomesteadInetAddrType,
sproutHomesteadInetAddr }
::= { sproutConnectedHomesteadsTable 1 }
The .4 is the Address type (IPv4), and then the next four octets make up the
address.
From: Clearwater <clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org> On Behalf Of
matvey bossis
Sent: 25 March 2019 12:33
To: clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti
NOTE: Message is from an external sender
So maybe someone has an up-to-date monitoring setup and willing to share?
BTW, looks like "Chronos" metrics were removed from Sprout. Perhaps completely
renamed? Or irrelevant?
Didn't figure out yet, what is the best way to graph the additional Sprout
metrics, not present in the template. So maybe someone has a setup, or
screenshots...
What about SNMP for SIPp? The Cacti template uses zero-mq, and nothing
interesting in SNMP there. Should it work? Or zero-mq only?
Mark, maybe you know: some of the OIDs, which were changed in the above commit,
seem to need an additional ".4.110.111.100.101" suffix. Does it have something
to do with the commit? Or where could it come from? (For example:
.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.2.4.110.111.100.101. Those which didn't change,
don't need this suffix.)
Thanks
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 17:10, Mark Perryman
<mark.perry...@metaswitch.com<mailto:mark.perry...@metaswitch.com>> wrote:
Yes.
It looks like the OIDs were changed here:
https://github.com/Metaswitch/clearwater-snmp-handlers/pull/168/files
Hope that helps,
Mark.
From: Clearwater
<clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org>>
On Behalf Of matvey bossis
Sent: 19 March 2019 15:04
To:
clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org>
Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti
NOTE: Message is from an external sender
Thanks,
so for example:
> snmpwalk -v2c -c clearwater 192.168.37.17:25565<http://192.168.37.17:25565>
> 1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3
produces:
PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopePrevious5SecondPeriod."node"
= Gauge32: 148
PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopeCurrent5MinutePeriod."node" =
Gauge32: 161
PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopePrevious5MinutePeriod."node"
= Gauge32: 139
Am I right to infer, that the .3 in the end, replaces the deprecated .2 (or
.2.1) in the end ?
(And that the .2 was a single metric, while the new one comes in 3
aggregations?)
The above seems to be translated from:
.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.1.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 148
.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.2.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 161
.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.3.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 139
So the logic to change the OIDs of the metrics must have been, that they are
not 100% backwards compatible?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 15:13, Mark Perryman
<mark.perry...@metaswitch.com<mailto:mark.perry...@metaswitch.com>> wrote:
Thanks, yes it appears the Cacti templates haven’t been kept up to date.
Instructions for using the correct MIB is at:
https://clearwater.readthedocs.io/en/stable/Clearwater_SNMP_Statistics.html
If you do create an up to date cacti template, please submit a Pull Request
with it (you would need to sign our contributors agreement).
Thanks,
Mark Perryman.
From: Clearwater
<clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org>>
On Behalf Of matvey bossis
Sent: 18 March 2019 13:00
To:
clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org>
Subject: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti
NOTE: Message is from an external sender
My OIDs seem to be different from the ones in the Cacti templates, for Bono,
Sprout etc. Am I doing something wrong?
Does anyone have the correct templates? Maybe a screenshot of your Cacti
graphs, please?
Thank you
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org>
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org>
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
