Hi all, I am +1 for including it if our concern is having it inside Clerezza, not just having it released. I think it would fit well in Clerezza, maybe as a separate Maven project in trunk (not org.apache.clerezza.parent module). By the way, I think that, in an hopefully near future, we could have better design refactoring modules' organization inside org.apache.clerezza.parent. Cheers, Tommaso
2010/9/29 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]> > Hi > > according to http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html we can include BSD > icensed code in both source and binary form, so there's no legal problem to > cpying the stuff over. I think having it integrated gives as the greates > flexibility, but as I think this module doesn't directly deal with rdf its > also easy to have at a separate utility. > > Ceers, > reto > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henry Story <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a final 0.5 version of the keygen module at > > > > http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp > > > > (There is a piece related to Xwiki in there that is not relevant to this > > discussion) > > > > We could publish it back to http://sommer.dev.java.net/ and from there > > onto > > the Maven central repository. But I am just no longer sure about what is > > going on > > at dev.java.net. As I am now commiter at Clerezza I could also just move > > that > > piece onto Clerezza, as it is made up of BSD licences from Manchester and > > from me. > > > > Then I think it will more easily get into the maven repository.... > > Is there an issue with this? This would allow Clerezza to have finally a > > working foaf+ssl implementation, as it has been waiting for this release > for > > some time. > > > > Otherwise I can push this to sommer.dev.java.net and from there onto > > Maven. > > > > Henry > > > > Social Web Architect > > http://bblfish.net/ > > > > >
