hi there I am little bit concerned about the renaming because all users have to change their dependencies (as long as apache clerezza has missing release 1.0 features and stability issues). Seems to be a lot of work for them as well.
IMO it makes sense to remove "org.apache.clerezza" from the artifactid but the question is when should it be removed - I think it would be ok when all necessary improvements/bugfixes for release 1.0 are done. I am not sure about the renaming of the parent to something else and I am against renaming it to "clerezza". cheers tsuy On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > > Il giorno 07/nov/2010, alle ore 18.13, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer ha scritto: > >> I think it would be good to increase the probability the module keep their >> names when doing a release, if this requires little efforr. >> >> Two possibilities: >> - Cut away "org.apache.clerezza" from the artifact-ids, optionally rename >> "parent" to something else ("clerezza" ?) -> The bundleId should be changes >> to groupId:artifactId to prevent ambiguity > > +1 removing that prefix would make browsing and reading modules much more > easy. > Tommaso > >> - Introduce more nesting by having additional parents and group-ids for >> platform, rdf, ext, uima and possibly jaxrs (with fileserver moved into it) >> >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers, >> Reto > >
