On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > +1, I also think that we need to close the issues for the release then do a > "code-freeze" before start that refactoring. > > [WISH] > Do you consider also changing directory names (removing org.apache.clerezza > prefix)? > I know that's not easy and requires a lot of work (SVN delete and add) but > it would make browsing modules much more easy. > [/WISH] > I'd suggest to do a script that start from the leaves and commits after every move, after the troubles I had today with SVN I'm not sure it will run so smoothly. > > > > > > I am not sure about the renaming of the parent to something else and I > > am against renaming it to "clerezza". > > > > clerezza-parent or clerezza-reactor could be good. > Regards, > Tommaso > > > > > > > cheers tsuy > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Il giorno 07/nov/2010, alle ore 18.13, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer ha scritto: > > > > > >> I think it would be good to increase the probability the module keep > > their > > >> names when doing a release, if this requires little efforr. > > >> > > >> Two possibilities: > > >> - Cut away "org.apache.clerezza" from the artifact-ids, optionally > > rename > > >> "parent" to something else ("clerezza" ?) -> The bundleId should be > > changes > > >> to groupId:artifactId to prevent ambiguity > > > > > > +1 removing that prefix would make browsing and reading modules much > more > > easy. > > > Tommaso > > > > > >> - Introduce more nesting by having additional parents and group-ids > for > > >> platform, rdf, ext, uima and possibly jaxrs (with fileserver moved > into > > it) > > >> > > >> What do you think? > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Reto > > > > > > > > >
