On 16 November 2010 22:26, Ian Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote: > So I think it's great if you can help Paolo understand what the implications > of also supporting OSGi would be, but I for one would like a discussion of > the pros & cons of the outcomes of that investigation before we decide to > complicate the Jena build process.
Perhaps we can find a way to produce two jars with just one pom.xml and one or two assembly.xml files. We type mvn package, magic happens and we have two artifacts: one identical to the current Jena jar and one which is a Jena OSGi bundle (which Clerezza could use as it is). This way we could satisfy the needs of the two different type of users. It is not my intention to "disrupt" the current building/publishing system at this point in time. (Same reason why I did put the current OSGi stuff in a profile which you need to activate if you want it to kick in). At the moment, I am just interested in understanding what are the possibilities here. Paolo > > > Ian > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Ian Dickinson Epimorphics Ltd, Bristol, UK > mailto:[email protected] http://www.epimorphics.com > cell: +44-7786-850536 landline: +44-1275-399069 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England > (no. 7016688). Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High St, > Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT, UK > >
