Hi James has agreed to release license mozile under the ASL.
As you can read in his mail some icons are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license. In http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html I don't see the CC licenses listed. Doe anyone know if these icons can be included? Cheers, Reto ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James A. Overton <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:28 PM Subject: Re: Mozile To: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> Hi Reto, I'm ready to make the licensing changes, but I want to check the details with you first. I presume that it's Mozile 0.8 that you want to use -- if not, let me know. Mozile 0.8 is currently distributed under any one of three licenses (http://mozile.mozdev.org/0.8/LICENSE). My thought was to simply add Apache 2.0 as a fourth available license. Since I wrote all of the Mozile 0.8 code myself, I can make that change. However there are some icons included in the Mozile 0.8 distribution from the Silk icon set, which are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license (http://mozile.mozdev.org/0.8/images/silk/COPYING). Is that acceptable for your purposes? If not, you'll have to replace them with something else, I guess. I don't know anything about this hallo-editor, but Mozile does not work the same as contentEditable editors. ContentEditable started in old versions of IE and presents some basic editing commands to produce HTML 3 era markup. Mozile uses standard DOM commands. (Sometimes Mozile uses contentEditable just to get an editing cursor.) In theory, Mozile should be more powerful and flexible. In practice, the Mozile code always had bugs, and by now it's pretty old. James On 2011-07-15, at 14:31 , Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Hi James > > That's good news! > > I noticed the problem right before the planed release, so for this very first > release (currently being voted upon) i just removed mozile > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-608). I opened a new issue > (CLEREZZA-609) to re-allow inline editing. > > Another editor I wanted to look at is henry bergius hallo-editor. A > minimalistic conetntEditable based editor. Do you happen to know how the > different approaches compare? > > Hope you're enjoying your travelling. > > Cheers, > Reto > On Jul 15, 2011 3:19 PM, "James A. Overton" <[email protected]> wrote:
