Thanks Henry for finding this. This means that with mozile apache licensed we can undo the removing of mozile and have and have wysiwyg editing back in the discobits editor.
@James: could you add an adapted license notice to the source repository? Cheers, Reto On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Henry Story <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2011, at 15:47, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > >> Hi >> >> James has agreed to release license mozile under the ASL. >> >> As you can read in his mail some icons are licensed under the Creative >> Commons Attribution 2.5 license. In >> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html I don't see the CC licenses >> listed. >> >> Doe anyone know if these icons can be included? > > They are listed here > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > This is the resource that the 3party points to as the official version. > > CC seems to be accepted there. > > >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: James A. Overton <[email protected]> >> Date: Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:28 PM >> Subject: Re: Mozile >> To: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> >> >> >> Hi Reto, >> >> I'm ready to make the licensing changes, but I want to check the >> details with you first. I presume that it's Mozile 0.8 that you want >> to use -- if not, let me know. Mozile 0.8 is currently distributed >> under any one of three licenses >> (http://mozile.mozdev.org/0.8/LICENSE). My thought was to simply add >> Apache 2.0 as a fourth available license. Since I wrote all of the >> Mozile 0.8 code myself, I can make that change. >> >> However there are some icons included in the Mozile 0.8 distribution >> from the Silk icon set, which are licensed under Creative Commons >> Attribution 2.5 license >> (http://mozile.mozdev.org/0.8/images/silk/COPYING). Is that acceptable >> for your purposes? If not, you'll have to replace them with something >> else, I guess. >> >> I don't know anything about this hallo-editor, but Mozile does not >> work the same as contentEditable editors. ContentEditable started in >> old versions of IE and presents some basic editing commands to produce >> HTML 3 era markup. Mozile uses standard DOM commands. (Sometimes >> Mozile uses contentEditable just to get an editing cursor.) In theory, >> Mozile should be more powerful and flexible. In practice, the Mozile >> code always had bugs, and by now it's pretty old. >> >> James >> >> >> >> On 2011-07-15, at 14:31 , Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: >> >>> Hi James >>> >>> That's good news! >>> >>> I noticed the problem right before the planed release, so for this very >>> first release (currently being voted upon) i just removed mozile >>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-608). I opened a new issue >>> (CLEREZZA-609) to re-allow inline editing. >>> >>> Another editor I wanted to look at is henry bergius hallo-editor. A >>> minimalistic conetntEditable based editor. Do you happen to know how the >>> different approaches compare? >>> >>> Hope you're enjoying your travelling. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Reto >>> On Jul 15, 2011 3:19 PM, "James A. Overton" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
