Dear Reto, I cannot reproduce my problem today. I tried again from scratch and everything went well :)
I closed the issue opened yesterday, to not block the releasing process. Thank you Enrico On 3 January 2012 17:56, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Bertrand wrote: >>>> 5) Is the notice in ext.org.json.simple/NOTICE.txt really required? >>>> Unless I missed something, http://code.google.com/p/json-simple/ >>>> doesn't seem to require it. >>> Isn't it just good practice to indicate the source of copyright owner >>> of included code in NOTICE.txt? The json simple one seems >>> unnecessarily verbose though. >> >> No, the NOTICE file should only list *required* notices, as it puts a >> burden on whoever might redistribute the code. So if you have some >> cleanup to do anyway, you could minimize that one unless what's in >> there is required. > Ok, so as json simple is apache licensed without notice file we should > not mention them. (Don't quite understand the logic of the apache > license which allows the content of the notice to alternatively be > included in the documentation or other places, and if this is the case > a derivate of the derivate no longer has the content of the notice). > > I'll remove the suff from the file. > > Cheers, > Reto -- Enrico Daga -- http://www.enridaga.net skype: enri-pan
