go moko wrote: >> Any reason why we're not doing it this way? > > The standard sed doesn't know the option -i to operate > on the same file in input and in output. As we cannot > suppose what is the sed installed on the original > system, I think it's the reason, until the new sed is > installed with this useful option.
I didn't include the -i option in my proposal, but you're right, the way I suggested would require -i. Looks like I wasn't thinking clearly there - thanks for going easy on me. -- JH _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://ninja.linux-phreak.biz/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
