> > The standard sed doesn't know the option -i to > operate > > on the same file in input and in output. As we > cannot > > suppose what is the sed installed on the original > > system, I think it's the reason, until the new sed > is > > installed with this useful option. > > I didn't include the -i option in my proposal, but > you're right, the way > I suggested would require -i. Looks like I wasn't > thinking clearly there > - thanks for going easy on me.
Oops, mis-reading! I thought "-i" as I had a similar question some time before. My excuses. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://ninja.linux-phreak.biz/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
