Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:29:45PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
Well, since you've opened this can of worms ...
A system without a working editor isn't fully functional. Yes, I
know real men can write just about anything in bash, and heroes can
probably write a functional editor with a simple here document, but
adding vim to the boot build for 1.1 would be nice - it
cross-compiles OK with Joe's 2.0 patch, although in my experience it
only works like vi (so, it might need an /etc/vimrc or similar).
People are starting to convince me on this one.
Oh, and _fully_ functional usually means a bit of cblfs (ssh or
nfs, for example). Where should we draw the line ?
This is a tricky part, I feel any extras beyond a base temp-system, need
to be outlined elsewhere. As examples, the alternative file systems I
posted on the CLFS trac wiki could be the reference point for this.
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/wiki/file_systems, we could probably get
Justin to rename this to temp-system Addons.
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
