On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 05:48:11PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote: > > Oh, and _fully_ functional usually means a bit of cblfs (ssh or > >nfs, for example). Where should we draw the line ? > > > This is a tricky part, I feel any extras beyond a base temp-system, need > to be outlined elsewhere. As examples, the alternative file systems I > posted on the CLFS trac wiki could be the reference point for this. > http://trac.cross-lfs.org/wiki/file_systems, we could probably get > Justin to rename this to temp-system Addons. > Agreed. The temp system should be adequate for finishing the build, for most people that doesn't mean nfs or ssh. The temp system needs to be "(only) just good enough" ;)
Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
