On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 09:28 AM, William Harrington wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote: > > > Is the goal to not adopt systemd but still get udev type > > functionality? > > I'd like that. Some people prefer systemd, others prefer to keep it > simple. > > Most of the time users will end up doing their own thing no matter > what is in the book.
Can you elaborate as to why systemd isn't desired? Especially if udev is? For better or worse it seems they come together now. -Andrew _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
