On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Brandon Peirce wrote:
> Ken wrote:
> > as one of the proponents of pure64, I regard it as easier ;)
> [reams advice snipped]
Yeah, I tend to default to --verbose, but at least it should be in the
recent archives now ;)
> > Yes, the target determines which version of the book, all you
> >change is the CLFS_HOST variable. I've no experience of non-native
> >builds for i{4,5}86, but I think somebody had issues a month or two
> >back building for i586, it's probably in the archives with the fix.
>
> I suppose it's this one you refer to?
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.cross-lfs/1483/focus=1483
> Looks like the problems there come from experimental and not-well-
> understood deviations from the book, so I won't worry too much 'bout that.
>
Actually, I'm not sure it was that one, maybe it was earlier, or
maybe my memory is faulty.
> If anyone else has any opinion on doing i686 -> i586 as Clfs
> vs. doing it as vanilla LFS with -march, I'm listening....
>
Me too, one day I might try recommissioning my k6, just to see if
graphical apps look as bad as I remember.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
