On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:20:00PM +0100, Luca wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> I didn't send the output of the set command simply because I'm not at
> home and I don't have remote access to my pc from the house of a friend
> of mine...
[...]
> I was modifying some things because I'm working on a automation build
> process of system plus creating live and installation isos (CD and DVD).
> I've set a general config.cache file that is loaded before each package
> configure process and set other dirs like tools.cross, tools.chain,
> tools.native etc...
 So, there is at least a possibility that something in your scripts
is wrong.  I've got difficulty imagining why a general config.cache
would be useful, but each to his own.  However, you _are_ deviating
from the book (three sets of tool directories), so things can break
in unexpected ways.  I'm reminded of people who decided not to build
the first part of LFS in /mnt/lfs/tools - from time to time they get
strange breakages because /tools has been hardcoded into patches.

 I strongly recommend you do what I suggested yesterday - try to
configure texinfo in the normal way so that it fails, then look at
the appropriate config.log (without going back through the thread, I
don't know if it's the top level config.log or one in a subdirectory)
and look at the results which caused the error message.

 It might be embarrassing (I've had my share of these, such
as passing -mpcu=7450 to a cross-compile for x86), it might be
specific to your variations, or it might be something that other
people will hit (maybe even a problem with the book).  It's that
last possibility that really concerns me, plus the opportunity for
you to learn how to debug configure problems.

Ken
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to