Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>  So, there is at least a possibility that something in your scripts
> is wrong.  I've got difficulty imagining why a general config.cache
> would be useful, but each to his own.  However, you _are_ deviating
> from the book (three sets of tool directories), so things can break
> in unexpected ways.  I'm reminded of people who decided not to build
> the first part of LFS in /mnt/lfs/tools - from time to time they get
> strange breakages because /tools has been hardcoded into patches.
>
>  I strongly recommend you do what I suggested yesterday - try to
> configure texinfo in the normal way so that it fails, then look at
> the appropriate config.log (without going back through the thread, I
> don't know if it's the top level config.log or one in a subdirectory)
> and look at the results which caused the error message.
>
>  It might be embarrassing (I've had my share of these, such
> as passing -mpcu=7450 to a cross-compile for x86), it might be
> specific to your variations, or it might be something that other
> people will hit (maybe even a problem with the book).  It's that
> last possibility that really concerns me, plus the opportunity for
> you to learn how to debug configure problems.
>
> Ken
>   
Hi Ken!

The strangeness continues...
I have just tried rebuilding texinfo with the same scripts without
modifying anything and the package built successfully... So I think that
it was a "temporary" problem, probably something over set by something
else and not related to the package in question nor to the scripts.

Luca
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to