On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 02:08:37PM +0300, Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
> On Saturday 25 November 2006 11:13, jignesh gangani wrote:
> > I have BLFS-6.1 as reference.
> 
> First, BLFS-6.1 is _too_ old for using with the latest xLFS's. BLFS
> editors recommend using development version of the BLFS book rather
> than a stable one at the moment.
> 

 This is good advice.  Can I also remind Jignesh to look at both the
blfs wiki and the cblfs wiki - you'll still encounter problems, but
hopefully the wikis will reduce them.  Often, the versions in the
cblfs wiki are ahead of what's in blfs-svn at the moment - so long
as you don't mix versions in gnome (glib, gtk, atk, pango need to
match, as well as any gnome libraries and applications), and in kde
(qt-3.3.7, arts-1.5.5, and kde-3.5.5 at the moment) you can follow
whatever instructions are out there.

> If you're going to build a package you should first build all its
> required dependencies (and their dependencies as well), then those of
> the optional dependencies you'd like (and their ones too), and then the
> package in question.
> 
 Sometimes, you need to research what benefits (if any) an optional
dependency will provide.  You may also need to consider if you
really want all the packages on your list.

> > 2. Should I build X and Kde first and all the other softwares afterwards?
> 
> No, actually. For example, you should build OpenSSL _before_ KDE. But
> if you're going to build some X application the you have to build it
> _after_ building X.
> 
 
 Again, the following remarks are directed to the Jignesh -

 Building a workable desktop is a big undertaking if you haven't
done it before - in my case I build in excess of 125 packages (not
including X).  For me, a chunk of that is because I need some gnome
applications, kde is a lot more conveniently packaged.  But, even if
you cut down to a mere 30 packages plus X, you will still have to
build a lot before you get a "comfortable" desktop.  So, I advise
you to consider using a different window manager during the build -
personally, I find twm painful.  You also need to consider how you
are going to google for help on the problems you encounter (e.g.
lynx).

 Mostly, people should be using Xorg-7.1 now.  If you don't have
extremely new hardware, you might find it easier to use 6.9 this
time, then move to modular-X for your next system (the difference
between one big package and your choice from more than 175
packages).

HTH
ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to