On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:58:45 -0400 Andrew Bradford <[email protected]> wrote:
> You may end up hitting [2] with 0.9.32. I'm now looking into that. It > looks like building gcc with --disable-shared caused libgcc_eh.a to not > be built, but uClibc wants it. > > [2]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.cross-compiling/14074 Creating a symlink for libgcc_eh.a [1] seems to work, at least for compiling. Worth trying. But now we're hacking and it's getting rather inelegant... And I don't know what the consequences are of doing this. [1]: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00591.html -Andrew _______________________________________________ Clfs-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
