Yes an RC would probably be good, with a code feature freeze after that. So it 2.1.0 doesn't drag out.
regards Malcolm On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Bob Schellink <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, lets get 2.1.0 out. Probably a RC? > > On 5/18/09, Malcolm Edgar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Click didn't progress through to a TLP yet as feedback from the Apache >> was that the community needed to be bigger. So we will try again in a >> few months time. >> >> In the mean time we need to increase the visibility of the framework. >> I think a good way of doing this is through a release, and promotion >> and some articles. >> >> If we don't time box the 2.1.0 release date, it can drag on forever. >> >> regards Malcolm Edgar >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Adrian A. <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> What do people think about targeting the end of May as the release >>>> date for Apache Click 2.1.0 ? >>> >>> I would rather see the many issues standing out to be solved first, and >>> only >>> after to do a release (otherwise the difference between patches and trunk >>> will be bigger and bigger each day). >>> >>> Also, since the voting of moving click to TLP was done, it would be much >>> nicer if Click 2.1.0 would be released that way (without the incubator >>> tag). >>> >>> >> > > > -- > http://incubator.apache.org/click/ >
