Hi, ClickIDE (supports Apache Click 2.1.0) release is ready.
But I don't understand a release process completely... Should I release ClickIDE according to the following documents? http://incubator.apache.org/click/docs/developer-guide/releasing-subprojects.html 2009/5/19 Bob Schellink <[email protected]>: > We also need to look at releasing ClickIDE. I assume we go through the same > procedure for releasing a subproject? > > bob > > > Malcolm Edgar wrote: >> >> Yes an RC would probably be good, with a code feature freeze after >> that. So it 2.1.0 doesn't drag out. >> >> regards Malcolm >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Bob Schellink <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Agreed, lets get 2.1.0 out. Probably a RC? >>> >>> On 5/18/09, Malcolm Edgar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Click didn't progress through to a TLP yet as feedback from the Apache >>>> was that the community needed to be bigger. So we will try again in a >>>> few months time. >>>> >>>> In the mean time we need to increase the visibility of the framework. >>>> I think a good way of doing this is through a release, and promotion >>>> and some articles. >>>> >>>> If we don't time box the 2.1.0 release date, it can drag on forever. >>>> >>>> regards Malcolm Edgar >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Adrian A. <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What do people think about targeting the end of May as the release >>>>>> date for Apache Click 2.1.0 ? >>>>> >>>>> I would rather see the many issues standing out to be solved first, and >>>>> only >>>>> after to do a release (otherwise the difference between patches and >>>>> trunk >>>>> will be bigger and bigger each day). >>>>> >>>>> Also, since the voting of moving click to TLP was done, it would be >>>>> much >>>>> nicer if Click 2.1.0 would be released that way (without the incubator >>>>> tag). >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/ >>> >> > > -- Naoki Takezoe
