Malcolm,
Please make it harder so that we should need to do at least 10% of the
work :-) I don't want to get any lazier then I am already.
Joking aside, that sounds great then.
Regards,
Huy
Agree, but I think this is how people would probably use it. The
TableBuilder and FormBuilder would have 95% of the code you would need
and then you would subclass it to provide that last 5% for your work.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:35 PM,
[email protected]<[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah builders/factories are great for building click forms/tables, but I
find writing my own much more flexible because I always tend to customize
the objects created.
Huy
Hi Malcolm,
This looks awesome. Definitely makes for good examples.
regards
bob
Malcolm Edgar wrote:
Please see the JIRA below:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-565
This provides two example patterns. I think it would be good to
include something like this in click extras.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Adrian A.<[email protected]> wrote:
This is a topic I wanted to raise for 2.2 is introducing a
builder/factory capability in Click. We have used this in projects
and it greatly number of lines of code. Personally I think this is a
better approach than method chaining.
+1 for this (instead of method chaining). The same for other frequently
used
APIs.
I
will u pload some builder/factory patterns later today.
Any news on this?
Thank you,
Adrian.
