:) I am actually coming around to the builder pattern, previously I have used the factory pattern. I would like to try it on a project to get a better feel for its use.
regards Malcolm Edgar On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:04 PM, [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote: > Malcolm, > > Please make it harder so that we should need to do at least 10% of the work > :-) I don't want to get any lazier then I am already. > > Joking aside, that sounds great then. > > Regards, > > Huy >> >> Agree, but I think this is how people would probably use it. The >> TableBuilder and FormBuilder would have 95% of the code you would need >> and then you would subclass it to provide that last 5% for your work. >> >> regards Malcolm Edgar >> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:35 PM, >> [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Yeah builders/factories are great for building click forms/tables, but I >>> find writing my own much more flexible because I always tend to customize >>> the objects created. >>> >>> Huy >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Malcolm, >>>> >>>> This looks awesome. Definitely makes for good examples. >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> bob >>>> >>>> >>>> Malcolm Edgar wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please see the JIRA below: >>>>> >>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-565 >>>>> >>>>> This provides two example patterns. I think it would be good to >>>>> include something like this in click extras. >>>>> >>>>> regards Malcolm Edgar >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Adrian A.<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a topic I wanted to raise for 2.2 is introducing a >>>>>>> builder/factory capability in Click. We have used this in projects >>>>>>> and it greatly number of lines of code. Personally I think this is a >>>>>>> better approach than method chaining. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for this (instead of method chaining). The same for other >>>>>> frequently >>>>>> used >>>>>> APIs. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> will u pload some builder/factory patterns later today. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any news on this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> > >
