> When JEditorPane shown HTML form with multi-selection, the reset operation 
> broke its data.
> 
> The sample testcase were attached in JBS. The recreate steps are below:
> 1. The sample shows a multi-selection form with 5 items.
> 2. Select the 4th item.
> 3. Press the reset button.
> Actual: The 4th item is still selected.
> Expect: No item should be selected. Resetting operation may move to the 
> initial state. The sample doesn't use 'selected' property in each option tag.
> 4. Just after the step 3, move the focus to outside of the application and 
> back.
> Actual: The 2nd item is selected. It means inside data indicates so.
> Expect: No item is selected.
> 
> There are two issues. The current method 
> `OptionListModel.removeIndexInterval()` removed the indexed item, and shifted 
> the rest. Then, selection values were corrupted.
> I think the clear selection method `OptionListModel.clearSelection()` is 
> suitable here.
> 
> Test: jdk_desktop on macOS (x64, Monterey), Linux (x64, RHEL8), and Windows 
> (x64, 2012R2).
>       No regression found

Toshio Nakamura has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Update Copyright years
 - Merge branch 'master' into 8295248
 - Fixed space
 - Update testcase
 - 8295248: JEditorPane HTML form with multi selection broke drawing after 
reseting

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10685/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10685/files/afe379e7..ca10ff83

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=10685&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=10685&range=02-03

  Stats: 433393 lines in 6803 files changed: 215149 ins; 142592 del; 75652 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10685.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10685/head:pull/10685

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10685

Reply via email to