On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:53:01 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hmm, I lean towards jint as I feel it conveys the fact that it is a Java >> parameter clearer, intuitively to me it makes sense that a Java integer type >> would still work in a C++ for loop in native code > > You're right… it gives a hint it'll be an upcall into Java. Let's go for > `jint` then. > > I don't think there's a need to change the type of the for-loop variable to > `jint`. Oh no, I didn't mean to change the loop variable, rather that leaving the jint as is should be fine in the for loop ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125#discussion_r1240044495
