More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
------------- Commit messages: - More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307246 Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 3 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17030/head:pull/17030 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030