More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, 
PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows 
platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - More correct way to take in consideration nonzero 
PHYSICALOFFSETX,PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files
 Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307246
  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17030/head:pull/17030

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030

Reply via email to